|
At this point, it is obviously better to evaluate
different devices based on other criteria as, for example the following
factors:
Ease of use:
Is the software
easy to use? Is it user friendly, and does it offer the features, tools
and capabilities you need to handle testing now and in the future when your capabilities
expand?
Is the software current technology?
In the software
development game the tools and rules change every year.
Some software developed more than six years ago is not compatible with current-generation operating
systems (Windows 95, 98 and NT). What will the picture look
like in another three years?
Ability to Upgrade Easily:
Can you upgrade
your device at a reasonable cost year after year as the technology
changes, or will you have to buy a new device in a few
years to stay current with technology?
Hardware:
Does the
software have hardware limitations? Some software and hardware
configurations are not compatible with current generation computers. For example Pentium
Class computers are too fast for some DOS applications.
Reliability:
Does the device you are examining have a track record
of being dependable? This is the kind of question you should ask other users who
have experience with the device in question.
Service:
What is the typical failure rate of equipment, and what is
the turnaround time for repairs? An EAV device is useful only if it is working properly in your office when you need it.
Support:
Is technical support available or even better, how
available? This is another question that should be directed to current users
of any device. |