|
Computerized EAV
(Electro-acupuncture according to Voll) Systems improve
testing efficiency and efficacy. |
|
Early generation EAV meters used an analogue needle
meter, similar to the speedometer in an automobile. The next progression
in EAV technology involved the interfacing of the meter with a computer
and custom software. Computers are very useful at displaying
information, saving and comparing data and organizing information in
database fashion. EAV practitioners used organized "trays" made of
cardboard, each containing 100 to 200 Remedies organized in rows and
columns. The doctors would physically retrieve the trays and test the
individual items, a very cumbersome, tedious process.
One of the goals
in computerized EAV was to better organize and access the thousands of
different Remedies that are used in testing.
|
The first generation computer EAV instruments attempted
to develop systems that would provide access to hundreds of different
remedies sealed in 1 milliliter test ampoules, built into an elaborate,
electronic switching mechanism. The computer would display the remedy on
the monitor and then go out and switch the electronics to bring the
field of the remedy from the trays into the circuit with the patient.
The technology was similar to placing the remedy on the test plate but
much more efficient.
However, the cost to build this apparatus was
exorbitant and the instruments were very unreliable. By accident, it was
found that when the computer was disconnected from the electronic remedy
tray system the testing still worked. In other words, with only a remedy
displayed as a word on the screen, the testing system worked!
|
|
The Holo Linguistic
Effect |
|
The next generation of computerized EAV used this
phenomenon, dubbing it the "Holo-Linguistic Effect", “Holo”, meaning
dimensionality and Linguistic meaning language or words. Thus, you get a
fancy way of saying that words on the screen of a computer are more than
just words on the screen of a computer.
How this mechanism works is unknown. There have been attempts to explain
the phenomenon by means of quantum physics. It may be more
understandable and accurate to say that this phenomenon is related to
the intuitive side of EAV. In every sense, EAV Testing depends on the
developed skills, abilities, intuition, intent and focus of the
practitioner. The value of these factors should not be discounted.
In many ways, they may be the key element in the healing process.
Why is it that one patient gets well and another doesn't?
|
The belief factor, the intent and "bedside manner" of the practitioner
can play a critical role in getting someone well.
The “Words on the Screen” technique works. It has proven itself in tens
of thousands of case histories. The results go far beyond the scope of
coincidence.
Is this a foolproof solution? No, of course not.
Can the
instrument be misused? Yes, and this has a lot to do with the intentions
of the practitioner.
Is "Word Testing” as accurate as testing the actual
remedy?
The question again clearly relates to the developed skills,
abilities, intuition, intent and focus of the practitioner. If a
practitioner's overall skills are questionable, then the results can be
distorted. But, if the practitioner’s ability and intent is clear and
clean, then “Word” Testing can be very effective.
|
|
The advantage of Word
Testing is simple. |
|
A computer can organize, display and sort through
thousands of remedies in a very efficient manner. A practitioner can
literally start with 20,000 different remedies and sort down to the few
key remedies in a short period of time by using the facilities of an EAV
Computerized System.
Current generation computerized EAV Systems do not have “Remedy
Frequencies” in the software.
The concept of “Word” Testing is just too simple and too unbelievable.
“There must be some sort of technical magic involved with these devices,
some technique that programs the remedies into the computer.” At least,
that is what many people are led to believe.
This scenario almost sounds plausible until you take a look at some very
simple, scientifically accepted, universal truths.
• Every remedy has a frequency, but to say this
doesn't even
begin to do justice in describing the immense complexity
of
the frequency pattern of a specific remedy.
• At this time there is no known method that will
measure
the actual frequency of a remedy. This is far beyond the
scope
of current day technology.
|
• If you cannot measure something, then you
certainly
cannot turn this unknown into a digital signal and program
it into a computer.
Even if you could measure the frequencies and program
them in, there is no way for the computer to broadcast them back to you
out of the software.
What we are dealing with here is the true essence of nature and life.
A good example is a synthetic vitamin. Synthetic vitamins have the exact
molecular structure as the natural counterpart. However, they do not
have the same effect in the body. Synthetic vitamins do not absorb as
easily, they do not have the same nutritional effects and over a period
of time, synthetic vitamins can produce side effects not found with
natural vitamins. The synthetics have the correct molecular structure,
but they are missing something. They are dead and not alive. The
"frequency" in part, accounts for this difference. Actually, the
difference is far beyond just a frequency; it is beyond the domain of
our present conscious or scientific understanding.
|
|
This raises the question: How do you
measure and quantify life?
|
|
Another
example is a high-potency homeopathic remedy. At potencies of 24X (24
dilutions of 1 part per 10) the chance of having one molecule of the
original substance in a bottle of a remedy is one in a million. Let's
say we have a 100X homeopathic (one part of the original substance
diluted one part per ten, 100 times, basically one drop in a large
lake). If we measure this very high potency remedy using a gas
chromatograph (an instrument that bends light to measure the specific
molecular constituents of any material) we will get a result that tells
us, without any question, that what we are dealing with is nothing more
than average, ordinary water.
Give this 100X remedy to some patients and
they certainly will see a different reaction than what you would expect
from water. The high potency homeopathic (greater than 24X/12C etc.) has
no original substance in it but it carries a powerful frequency
signature of the original substance.
However, state of the art technology, such as the gas chromatograph,
cannot measure this.
Research scientists have spent months trying to decipher the
electro-magnetic frequencies of remedies and at best they have come to
the conclusion that there are patterns and tendencies, but nothing more
exacting than this.
|
Clearly, we cannot measure the true
frequencies of remedies and we certainly cannot digitize and
program something that we cannot measure.
The difference between computerized instruments is nominal.
They essentially do the same thing.
Every EAV instrument is an OHM meter, and there is
absolutely no exception to this rule. The
computer-interfaced models give us, in addition, a powerful
set of software tools to work with.
Each manufacturer has its own way of approaching EAV
Testing. But, there are no secret technologies.
Some of the manufacturers have incorporated signal/frequency
generators as a means of offering a "secondary recognition
system". This is their way of explaining the fact that they
use “Word Testing” as well as an arbitrary square wave
signal. This type of technology needs to be explained.
The devices we are talking about use a "square wave" signal
generator. Every remedy listed in their database is
arbitrarily assigned a square wave frequency - a very simple
frequency value. There should be no question about the fact
that these frequencies are assigned. They are in every
respect arbitrarily assigned. This process can be simply
illustrated.
|
|
Square waves do not occur in nature!
|
|
AC
amplifiers make good square waves, but you will never find a square wave
in nature. Remedies never make square waves, and the frequency of any
remedy is never, in any way, measured as a square wave.
A square wave can look quite convincing to the uneducated eye on an
oscilloscope. It makes it appear as if the computer is sending out the
actual signal of a remedy, but it is not the frequency of the remedy and
it has no correlation with any remedy!
If these manufacturers could actually measure the frequencies of
remedies they would come up with complex patterns that look nothing like
a square wave.
Another critical point worth considering is this:
Assume that the square
wave signal generated by a testing device is in fact the actual
frequency of a remedy. Also assume that the technology is capable of
“square wave recognition” (the device can measure the frequency of a
remedy). If this assumption were valid then when an unknown remedy is
placed on the measuring tray, the computer program should be able to
recognize that remedy and name it, provided that it matched a
corresponding pattern programmed into the
software. |
This however is not the case.
A simple test of the validity of this assumption would be to
place a remedy that has no label on a device and have the
device, with no operator intervention, tell you what is
inside the bottle. The devices are certainly not capable of
performing this simple, analytical and objective
verification.
If you compare technologies, testing the actual remedy is
the best solution, but it is a very cumbersome procedure.
Testing with the “Words” (in actuality, more than words) is
very practical because of the computer software's
efficiency. However, “Word Testing” depends on the
practitioner’s skill and abilities, coupled with intuition
and intent.
In the final analysis between different types of
manufacturers’ devices, a shopper can get very confused and
frustrated trying to decipher the differences.
Again, when you clear away all of the hype and look at the
actual differences, all of the devices do the same thing in
their own way.
All of them are quite capable of doing EAV
Testing. It is valuable to look at the technological
differences but one must keep one thing in mind: "Scientific
Reality".
|
|
◄◄
BACK |
NEXT
►►
|
|
